do you really need a caption to tell you it's a Marlins game? |
Everyone wants to go to the best games, the best matchups,
the most important tilts. Nobody wants to go to the worst. Well, except me.
Consider all the MLB playoff spots that will come down to
this final weekend. The Dodgers, Cubs, Brewers, Rockies, Cardinals A’s and
Yankees all have something at stake.
But I don’t want to be at any of those series, because those
are the obvious things to pay attention to. I have always thought it would be
great- as a baseball fan that doesn’t need to have playoffs on the line- to go
to the worst last series of the year.
This really galvanized in 2012, when the Astros and Cubs,
when they were both in the NL Central, were both 100+ game losers and played
each other to end the season. It was the first time two teams with 100+ losses
had played each other in more than 50 years.
I thought that would have been a great series to attend
merely to see who the hell else went to that series voluntarily. It was at
Wrigley, so obviously it was well attended just because it was a
Cubs game, but what the hell would that have been like in Houston, or anywhere
else for that matter? I would like to go and talk to who's there. Is it parents of the 40th man on the roster waiting for his MLB debut? Is it all die-hards? Is it people making their ballpark tour and needed this one to finish the season? Who is there, exactly, and why? I think it would make a great documentary.
So now, every year, I check to see which would be the worst
last series to attend. In truth, the worst last weekday series would be the “best”
to attend because on weekends there’s generally some sort of crowd regardless. For
the final Monday-Thursday series there’s usually not much of a crowd for teams
well out of a playoff spot (for instance, the Padres-Giants series featured
more seagulls than people).
I have rather simple rules to determine the best worst final
series of the year. Obviously, it should not involve any playoff teams. It
should also not involve any teams over 500. Thus, the 112-loss Orioles, who
should be in the mix, are not an option because they are hosting the AL West
champion Astros. Similarly, the 102-loss Royals are hosting the AL Central
champion Indians. You understand how this works, there needs to be zero things
at stake for either team. The White Sox have 96 losses and are hosting the 84-loss
Twins, so there’s our first real option. The 94-loss Tigers are at the Brewers,
who are fighting for the NL Central, so they’re out.
Side note, the AL Central has been abysmal this year. The
Tigers have 94 losses and they’re likely going to finish 3rd.
On the NL side, the Reds have 93 losses but the Pirates are potentially
going to finish 500, so forget it. The Padres have 95 losses and are taking on
the D-Backs, who despite a horrendous collapse could still finish 500.
I’ll spare you going through the rest of the teams to say
that this year’s “winner” is Marlins at Mets. Yes, they have the same exact
records as the White Sox-Tigers series, so if you preferred that you could be
there. There are actually standings in play, as the Tigers are two games ahead
of the White Sox for 3rd, so there’s kind of something for both
teams to play for, which goes against the entire idea of this.
So I pick New Shea because it’s a last place team (Marlins)
versus a 4th place team (Mets).
For those of you who might argue that it’s a series with
something to it because the about-to-retire David Wright will make an
appearance, I say this:
Your argument for this series being relevant is that a guy
who hasn’t played in three years is going to basically pull a Minnie Minoso and
play like an inning just to say he did? Maybe you should re-think your thought
process, because you just successfully pointed out why this series is useless.
photo: si.com
No comments:
Post a Comment